Conservative supporters of HB2 saw it as a betrayal of principle.
Most notably, it required transgender individuals to use bathrooms that match the genders on their birth certificates rather than the genders they identify as, and prevented North Carolina cities - such as Charlotte, Chapel Hill, Durham and Raleigh - from protecting their own citizens without going through the state. According to the statement, North Carolina sites that are chosen to host championships will need to submit additional documentation to prove they won't discriminate, and the NCAA suggested it will review each selection on a case-by-case basis.
The NCAA statement details the principles embodied in the Texas Privacy Act which are mirrored in North Carolina's new law. The NCAA called the new bill "far from perfect" but deemed it acceptable enough to return events to the state.
"We will continue our work with them to fight for statewide anti-discrimination protections for LGBT North Carolinians", he added. Use of such facilities is still the prerogative of the state legislature.
We have been assured by the state that this new law allows the NCAA to enact its inclusive policies by contract with communities, universities, arenas, hotels, and other service providers that are doing business with us, our students, other participants, and fans. "So although I think any replacement bill is better than HB2, it's not satisfactory".
"I'm personally very pleased that they have a bill to debate and discuss", Emmert said then.
"It's now clear that there is no way for the NCAA to placate the far left, which will accept nothing less than the total surrender of those opposed to its agenda of opening every shower, locker room and bathroom to both men and women". That has the NCAA concerned about potential problems as it prepares to award championships from 2019 to 2022, and could lead the tournament to skip North Carolina in favor of one of its neighbors. In the video, he talks about the time he competed in North Carolina to earn his spot on Team USA for the second consecutive year.
In short, the NCAA determined the compromise reached in North Carolina "has minimally achieved a situation where we believe NCAA championships may be conducted in a nondiscriminatory environment".
"If we find that our expectations of a discrimination-free environment are not met, we will not hesitate to take necessary action at any time", the sports organization said.
"The NCAA did not lobby for any specific change in the law".
If the NCAA had pulled away from North Carolina, like it did for years when SC staunchly continued flying the Confederate flag, it would've sent a message that fair and equal treatment take precedence over championships and hosting privileges.
Briskman said she thinks HB142 was focused on saving face and income rather than transgender rights.
Freshman Derek Dzinich said he thought it was "ridiculous" that the HB2 battle was not completely repealed. "Nondiscrimination laws in North Carolina, even under HB2, have always been similar to 29 other states and 10,000 other multiplicities".